Collaborative Analysis 3 Rubric
| Category | 4 Accomplished |
3 Developing |
2 Beginning |
1 Does Not Meet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Writing & Language | Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing. | Good writing and minimal grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Formatting & Readings | The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited. | There are minimal APA formatting errors. | There are numerous APA formatting errors | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Relevant Readings: | The paper demonstrates that all members read the assigned readings and integrated those ideas into the paper (must be cited). | The paper cites all sources; however, they were not integrated into the writing | Minimal outside references. Limited and poor citations. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
|
Team Effectiveness |
Described & discussed the contact hypothesis and its it affect on the team. Used examples from your team. |
Contact hypothesis addressed but minimally applied to team. |
Contact hypothesis minimally addressed and not applied to team. |
Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Discussed the outgroup homogeneity bias. Discussed how it was resolved/reduced? |
Outgroup homogeity Bias addressed but minimally applied to team. | Outgroup homogeity Bias minimally addressed but not applied to team. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness: |
Defined superordinate goal?
Discussed how it affects team progress? |
Superordinate goal addressed but minimally applied to team. | Superordinate goal addressed but not applied to team. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Define and identifed team norms? Gave examples of norms from your team? Defined Team roles? Gave examples of roles from your team? |
Team norms were addressed and minimally applied to team. | Team norms were addressed but not applied to team. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Addressed dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment? Explained [without defining] your teams Committment vs Consensus. Gave example(s) from your team. |
Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed and minimally applied to team. | Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed but not applied to team. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Evolution |
Identified the Tuckman stage team is currently in. Explained how this stage is specific to your team. Used examples from your team |
The readings were clearly done and applied to the evolution of the team. However, the writing should be improved or there were sections that need elaboration. | The writing is poor. The stages were only minimally developed |
Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Evolution - WTW Data |
Presented, illustrated & explained who-to-whom data. |
WTW data reported with some explanation of data. | Some data reported but mimimal discussion of data. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Barriers & Solutions |
Described the problems that the team encountered. |
Problems, plan, and process were discussed fairly well. | Poor analysis of problems and lack of problem solving process. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Barriers & Solutions |
Described how team planned to solve these problems Used a table format.
|
Problems listed with some plan to reslove. | Problems listed with an incomplete plan to reslove. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Collaborative vs. Cooperative Work: |
Accomplished. Collaboration, written in one voice and good integration of ideas. |
Developing The degree of collaboration is developing with some cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas. |
Beginning Limited degree of collaboration with significant cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas. |
Does not meet minimum requirements. Team interaction/process and paper are both cooperative in nature. Team should seek help from PG. |