Skip to Main Content of Page

Collaborative On-Line Research and Learning

131 Grading Rubric Collaborative Analysis 3

Contact Collaborative On-Line Research and Learning

Collaborative On-Line Research and Learning

Thomas Treadwell

Department of Psychology
West Chester University of Pennsylvania
ttreadwell@wcupa.edu

Evan Leach

Department of Management
West Chester University of Pennsylvania
Eleach64@aol.com

Donna Ascraft

Department of Psychology
Clarion University
Clarion, PA
ashcraft@clarion.edu

Collaborative Analysis 3 Rubric

Category	4 Accomplished	3 Developing	2 Beginning	1 Does Not Meet
Writing & Language	Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing.	Good writing and minimal grammatical errors.	Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Formatting & Readings	The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited.	There are minimal APA formatting errors.	There are numerous APA formatting errors	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Relevant Readings:	The paper demonstrates that all members read the assigned readings and integrated those ideas into the paper (must be cited).	The paper cites all sources; however, they were not integrated into the writing	Minimal outside references. Limited and poor citations.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness	Described & discussed the contact hypothesis and its it affect on the team. Used examples from your team.	Contact hypothesis addressed but minimally applied to team.	Contact hypothesis minimally addressed and not applied to team.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness	Discussed the outgroup homogeneity bias. Discussed how it was resolved/reduced?	Outgroup homogeity Bias addressed but minimally applied to team.	Outgroup homogeity Bias minimally addressed but not applied to team.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness:	Defined superordinate goal? Described team’s superordinate goal? Described how superordinate goals affect team functioning? Discussed how team’s superordinate goal has been met? Discussed how it affects team progress?	Superordinate goal addressed but minimally applied to team.	Superordinate goal addressed but not applied to team.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness	Define and identifed team norms? Gave examples of norms from your team? Defined Team roles? Gave examples of roles from your team?	Team norms were addressed and minimally applied to team.	Team norms were addressed but not applied to team.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Effectiveness	Addressed dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment? Explained [without defining] your teams Committment vs Consensus. Gave example(s) from your team.	Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed and minimally applied to team.	Dysfunction # 3 Achieving Committment addressed but not applied to team.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution	Identified the Tuckman stage team is currently in. Explained how this stage is specific to your team. Used examples from your team	The readings were clearly done and applied to the evolution of the team. However, the writing should be improved or there were sections that need elaboration.	The writing is poor. The stages were only minimally developed	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Team Evolution - WTW Data	Presented, illustrated & explained who-to-whom data.	WTW data reported with some explanation of data.	Some data reported but mimimal discussion of data.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions	Described the problems that the team encountered.	Problems, plan, and process were discussed fairly well.	Poor analysis of problems and lack of problem solving process.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Barriers & Solutions	Described how team planned to solve these problems Used a table format.	Problems listed with some plan to reslove.	Problems listed with an incomplete plan to reslove.	Does not meet minimum requirements.
Collaborative vs. Cooperative Work:	Accomplished. Collaboration, written in one voice and good integration of ideas.	Developing The degree of collaboration is developing with some cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas.	Beginning Limited degree of collaboration with significant cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas.	Does not meet minimum requirements. Team interaction/process and paper are both cooperative in nature. Team should seek help from PG.

Back to top of page.