Collaborative Analysis 4 Rubric
| Category | 4 Accomplished |
3 Developing |
2 Beginning |
1 Does Not Meet |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Writing & Language | Well formed ideas explicated using clear writing and proper grammar. Concise and logical writing. | Good writing and minimal grammatical errors. | Numerous grammatical errors, poor flow, writing needs improvement. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Formatting & Readings | The paper is written in APA format without error. All citations are both in text and in the works cited. | There are minimal APA formatting errors. | There are numerous APA formatting errors | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Relevant Readings: | The paper demonstrates that all members read the assigned readings and integrated those ideas into the paper (must be cited). | The paper cites all sources; however, they were not integrated into the writing | Minimal outside references. Limited and poor citations. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
|
>Collaborative Team Effectiveness: |
Described relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis. Included examples of team effectiveness processes from team. |
>Described to some degree relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis. |
>Described minimally relevant team effectiveness processes from the first 3 Collaborative Analysis. |
>Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Did you incorporate team norms and roles? Explain how they changed from week one to week fifteen! |
>Some norms were addressed but early norms were missing. | >There were numerous norms missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness: |
Addressed dysfunctions 4 & 5. [Accountability & Results] Explained [without defining] your team’s accountability policy. Provided detail as to how the policy changed throughout the semester. |
>Dysfunctions were addressed well, yet one or two were missing. | >Minimal dysfunctions were addressed and or the writing was minimal or poor. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Discussed how> Result> oriented teams establish their own measurements for success. Explained how your team measured success. Apart from PG feedback. |
>Team norms were addressed and minimally applied to team. | >Team norms were addressed but not applied to team. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Effectiveness |
Addressed Dysfunction #2, Overcoming Fear of Conflict?
Give example from your team. |
>Most topics were addressed well, one or two were missing. | >There were numerous topics missing, and or the writing was minimal or poor. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Evolution |
Identified the Tuckman stage team is currently in. Explained how this stage is specific to your team. Used examples from your team |
The readings were clearly done and applied to the evolution of the team. However, the writing should be improved or there were sections that need elaboration. | The writing is poor. The stages were only minimally developed |
Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Team Evolution - WTW Data |
Presented, illustrated & explained who-to-whom data. |
WTW data reported with some explanation of data. | Some data reported but mimimal discussion of data. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Barriers & Solutions |
Described the problems that the team encountered. |
Problems, plan, and process were discussed fairly well. | Poor analysis of problems and lack of problem solving process. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| Barriers & Solutions |
Described how team planned to solve these problems Used a table format.
|
Problems listed with some plan to reslove. | Problems listed with an incomplete plan to reslove. | Does not meet minimum requirements. |
| >Collaboration, Flow and Integration: |
Accomplished. Collaboration, written in one voice and good integration of ideas. Integrated Collaborative Analyses I, II & III |
Developing There is a degree of collaboration with some cooperative issues regarding integration of ideas and overall flow. Mediocre Integration of Collaborative Analyses I, II & III |
Beginning Team demonstrates an understanding of collaborative versus cooperative concepts. Minimal Integration of Collaborative Analyses I, II & III |
Does not meet minimum requirements. |